Can i vote alberta
ID Required to Vote Explore what kinds of identification we accept and what alternatives are also available. Who Can Vote? How to Vote Voting Options: in person or by mail; and, how much time-off an elector can receive from work to attend a poll. Submissions that include telephone numbers, addresses, or emails will be removed.
Table of contents. Overview When Albertans went to the polls for the municipal election on October 18, , they were also able to vote on whether: to remove the principle of equalization payments from Canada's constitution Alberta should remain on Daylight Saving Time summer hours year-round Official results of the referendum are available on the Elections Alberta website. Equalization Equalization gives federal funding to provinces less well-off so that all provinces can provide a similar level of services to their citizens.
Update: Of those who responded to the equalization referendum question, Next steps The Alberta government will move forward with pursing this issue with the federal government. Daylight Saving Time Summer hours daylight saving time are the hours we observe in Alberta each year from the second Sunday in March until the first Sunday in November, when we revert to Standard Time.
Rather, it's what others think you have. He said the rest of Canada is seeing a province that has received generous federal COVID funding, has called in the military to rescue its COVIDravaged health system, and has seen Ottawa literally buy the Trans Mountain pipeline to help its oil industry. Bill Bewick, head of Fairness Alberta, a group stumping for a Yes vote, said critics confuse the message being sent with the more important principle of sending a message.
He said equalization is profoundly unfair to Alberta and that a referendum is a legal, practical, effective method for Albertans to get Ottawa's attention while providing a handy release valve for those who would otherwise seek more radical alternatives to make their voices heard. Bewick said a Yes vote from Alberta could push other provinces to pressure the federal government for meaningful changes to improve the equalization formula for all.
Some Yes supporters, including ousted UCP backbencher Drew Barnes, worry that with Kenney's low popularity numbers the No vote will get a boost from those who want to send a message to the premier. However, on Oct. University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe, who has taken the No side in recent debates with Bewick, said Alberta already has the power to discuss its equalization concerns with Ottawa. Kenney has contended that Alberta unfairly pays too much into the system.
He has said a yes vote would provide Alberta with leverage to negotiate a better deal with the federal government. The question on municipal ballots was: "Should Section 36 2 of the Constitution Act — Parliament and the government of Canada's commitment to the principle of equalization payments — be removed from the Constitution?
Nigel Bankes, a retired University of Calgary law professor, said it is "simply not the case" that a yes vote would end the practice of equalization payments, as stated on the Elections Alberta website. Critics have accused Kenney of misleading the public about what equalization is and how it works. Kenney has repeatedly claimed that Alberta is effectively subsidizing provinces like Quebec through the transfer of money that should stay in Alberta.
Bankes said the impression created by Elections Alberta's interpretation of a yes vote "would buttress what the Kenney government has been telling people, which is that we're sending too much money to other provinces that should be staying here.
Both Bankes and Eric Adams, a constitutional law expert at the University of Alberta, said the Elections Alberta explanation is incorrect because the vote wasn't about ending the practice of equalization.
Bankes, Adams and Stephanie Chouinard, an associate professor of political science at Queen's University, independently said the Elections Alberta explanation also was misleading because even if a yes vote won the referendum it would not necessarily end the practice of equalization. Chouinard said she reviewed the information about the referendum on the Elections Alberta website after seeing a protracted "Twitter spat" between University of Alberta economics professor Andrew Leach, who also has a master's degree in law, and the official Elections Alberta Twitter account, including on election day.
Later the same day, Leach tweeted: "Your reminder that even our ElectionsAB office continues to misrepresent the potential outcomes of the equalization referendum. Vote no to both the politics of division and the ongoing efforts to make Albertans less knowledgeable about our democracy.
0コメント